Site icon Planet Of Films

Penélope Cruz, Javier Calvo and Javier Ambrossi’s La Bola Negra Cannes Review Roundup: Critics Praise a Grand Queer Spanish Epic

La Bola Negra Cannes Review Roundup: Critics praise Los Javis’ ambitious queer Spanish epic starring Penélope Cruz and Glenn Close.

Photo courtesy Cannes Film Festival

La Bola Negra Cannes Review Roundup: Penélope Cruz joins Javier Calvo and Javier Ambrossi’s ambitious Cannes Competition title, a sweeping queer Spanish epic that has quickly become one of the festival’s major talking points. Internationally titled The Black Ball, the film draws from Federico García Lorca’s unfinished La Bola Negra and Alberto Conejero’s La piedra oscura, using three timelines to explore desire, repression, inheritance and queer memory across Spanish history.

Directed by Javier Calvo and Javier Ambrossi, popularly known as Los Javis, La Bola Negra stars Guitarricadelafuente, Carlos González, Miguel Bernardeau, Lola Dueñas, Penélope Cruz and Glenn Close. The film runs 155 minutes and is part of the Cannes Film Festival’s official Competition section. According to the Cannes synopsis, it tells the interconnected stories of three men in three different eras, linked by sexuality, desire, pain, inheritance and one of Lorca’s final unfinished works.

The film’s structure moves across three periods of Spanish history: 1932, 1937 and 2017. One thread is connected to Lorca, theatre, desire and artistic creation. Another moves through wartime Spain, where queer love exists under repression and danger. The modern-day section looks at inheritance, memory and the rediscovery of buried stories. The title itself carries the idea of rejection, exclusion and the social force that has historically pushed queer lives into silence.

The early Cannes response is largely positive, though not without reservations. Critics have praised the film’s scale, visual identity, craft, three-timeline structure and emotional sweep. Many reviews describe it as a major creative leap for Los Javis, who are best known internationally for Veneno and La Mesías. At the same time, some critics find the film overlong, melodramatic or too grand in its emotional gestures. The broad consensus is that La Bola Negra is a big swing — and for many critics, that swing lands.

The strongest praise has come from critics who admire the film’s structural ambition. Sophie Monks Kaufman of IndieWire gives the film an A, saying it is nearly impossible to grasp the structural effort required to create one coherent story from three narratives across three timelines, each with a distinct visual identity. That response captures one of the central reasons La Bola Negra has stood out at Cannes: it is not simply telling three stories, but trying to make them echo across time as one emotional and historical statement.

Richard Lawson of The Hollywood Reporter also responds strongly, calling the film “dazzlingly assured” and describing the pleasure of watching something ambitious actually land. His reaction frames La Bola Negra as one of those Cannes films whose impact comes from scale and confidence. It is not a small chamber drama about hidden lives; it is a large-format emotional and historical canvas that gives queer Spanish memory the size and sweep usually reserved for national epics.

Peter Bradshaw of The Guardian gives the film 4/5, calling it handsomely produced, lovingly detailed and confidently constructed. He praises the way the film brings its puzzle pieces together in the edit and describes it as a rich and rewarding movie. This is important because the film’s three-part design could easily have become confusing or overstuffed. For Bradshaw, the construction appears to be one of the film’s strengths rather than a weakness.

Brian Tallerico of RogerEbert.com, in the Rotten Tomatoes excerpt you shared, also highlights the writing. He says one story alone would make for riveting cinema, but the way it is anchored to the other two turns the film into an exceptional piece of writing. That reading supports the idea that La Bola Negra is not only impressive because of its scale, but because its timelines are meant to deepen each other. The past is not decorative; it reshapes the meaning of the present.

Other early reactions are even more enthusiastic. Sean Boelman of FandomWire gives the film 10/10, calling it beautiful from both a visual and narrative standpoint and describing it as an incredibly big swing that pays off. Cody Dericks of Next Best Picture gives it 9/10, praising the mammoth theatrical vision and the directors’ control over the film’s craft elements. These responses suggest that the film may connect strongly with viewers who embrace its maximalism, theatricality and emotional scale.

Deadline’s response also appears to lean into the film’s romantic and emotional sweep. The review frames La Bola Negra as an unashamedly romantic, decades-spanning drama and suggests that Los Javis capture hearts with the film. That is useful because the film’s melodrama seems to be part of its design. It is not trying to be cool, distant or minimalist. Its emotional force comes from the belief that buried queer histories deserve intensity, beauty and grandeur.

Variety’s Guy Lodge offers a more cautious but still engaged response. In the excerpt you shared, he notes that the film’s channeling of Lorca’s language and imagery sometimes moves past lyricism into kitsch. At the same time, he acknowledges the presence of confidently muscular filmmaking and says the film makes him interested in where Javier Calvo and Javier Ambrossi will go next. That is a useful middle position: La Bola Negra may be excessive, but it is not timid or minor.

Screen Daily provides the clearest negative counterpoint. Lee Marshall calls the film a sprawling, undisciplined melodrama that aims for the multi-strand complexity of vintage Pedro Almodóvar but lacks Almodóvar’s sure, stylish feel for narrative elegance. This criticism points to the main risk of the film’s approach. When a film stretches across eras, literary references, historical trauma and emotional melodrama, the line between epic sweep and narrative overload becomes thin.

The Spanish critical response also appears to reflect this balance between admiration and caution. Elsa Fernández-Santos of El País, in the excerpt you shared, says La Bola Negra may suffer from certain excesses, including overly grandiose sequences, but remains compelling in its handling of a complex three-part structure. That response is valuable because it comes from within the film’s cultural context and still recognizes the same tension: the film is powerful and excessive at once.

The film’s Cannes reception has also added to its visibility. Spanish coverage reported a major ovation after the premiere, with the film described as an emotional milestone for Los Javis at the festival. El País reported that the film links Lorca with homosexuality in Spain across a century, and also noted the mixed but largely serious critical attention around the film, including praise from The Hollywood Reporter and The Guardian and more reserved responses from Variety and Screen International.

Penélope Cruz’s presence has become one of the most visible elements around the film, but the reviews suggest that La Bola Negra is not built as a star vehicle. Her role is part of a larger ensemble and historical structure. The film also includes Glenn Close, Guitarricadelafuente, Carlos González, Miguel Bernardeau and Lola Dueñas. The craft conversation around the film has focused more on the ensemble, the three timelines, the production design, the costumes, the music and the editing than on any single performer.

Guitarricadelafuente’s screen debut appears especially important to the film’s emotional and musical identity. The film’s relationship with performance, memory and Spanish cultural history makes music more than decoration. It becomes part of the way the film connects private desire with public inheritance. The three timelines reportedly have distinct visual identities, which is one reason critics have emphasized the film’s craft and construction.

The common praise across reviews is clear. Critics admire the ambition of Los Javis’ queer historical scope, the three-timeline structure, the Lorca-inspired literary frame, the emotional melodrama, the production design, the costumes, the cinematography and the musical elements. Several reactions praise the writing and editing required to bring the three stories together. The film is also being discussed as a major Cannes moment for Spanish cinema and for queer storytelling on a large canvas.

The common criticism is also clear. Some critics feel the 155-minute runtime stretches the material. Others point to grandiose sequences, melodramatic excess or a lack of discipline. Variety’s concern about lyricism tipping into kitsch and Screen Daily’s criticism of sprawling construction both suggest that the film’s strengths and weaknesses come from the same place: its refusal to be small. La Bola Negra wants to be literary, historical, emotional and visually grand all at once.

From a Planet of Films perspective, La Bola Negra appears to matter because it treats buried queer Spanish history not as a footnote, but as epic cinema. Los Javis use melodrama, literature, war history, music and visual spectacle to connect private desire with national memory. The film’s ambition is not only formal; it is political and emotional. It insists that stories of queer love, repression and inheritance deserve the same scale as traditional historical dramas.

That is also where the critical divide begins. For supporters, the film’s sweep gives queer memory the grandeur it has often been denied. For skeptics, that grandeur sometimes becomes heaviness. But even the mixed responses recognize that Javier Calvo and Javier Ambrossi have made a film of size, confidence and feeling. This is not a cautious festival exercise. It is a declaration of cinematic ambition.

The Cannes response suggests that La Bola Negra is one of the festival’s biggest and most discussed Competition titles. Critics praise Los Javis for building a visually grand queer epic around Lorca, Spanish history and intergenerational desire, with strong admiration for the film’s structure, craft and emotional force. Mixed responses point to its length, grandiosity and occasional lack of discipline, but even cautious reviews acknowledge the confidence of the filmmaking. The result is a bold Cannes statement from Javier Calvo and Javier Ambrossi, with Penélope Cruz and the ensemble helping bring visibility to a film that turns hidden histories into large-scale cinema.

Film: La Bola Negra
International Title: The Black Ball
Directors: Javier Calvo, Javier Ambrossi
Writers: Javier Calvo, Javier Ambrossi, Alberto Conejero
Inspired by: Federico García Lorca’s unfinished La Bola Negra and Alberto Conejero’s La piedra oscura
Cast: Guitarricadelafuente, Carlos González, Miguel Bernardeau, Lola Dueñas, Penélope Cruz, Glenn Close
Festival: Cannes Film Festival
Section: Competition
Country: Spain, France
Genre: Drama / Queer historical epic
Runtime: 155 minutes
Premise: Three gay men in three different eras of Spanish history are connected by sexuality, desire, pain, inheritance and Federico García Lorca’s unfinished work.

Read More:

Exit mobile version