Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu Review Roundup: Jon Favreau brings Din Djarin and Grogu from Disney+ to the big screen, marking the return of theatrical Star Wars after a long gap. Early reviews, however, suggest a divided response. Some critics call it a fun, action-heavy and family-friendly adventure, while others feel it plays like an extended episode of the series rather than a necessary cinematic event.
Directed by Jon Favreau and written by Favreau, Dave Filoni and Noah Kloor, the film continues the story of Din Djarin, played by Pedro Pascal, and Grogu, the small Force-sensitive figure who became the emotional center of The Mandalorian. The film also brings in Sigourney Weaver as Colonel Ward, Jeremy Allen White as the voice of Rotta the Hutt, Jonny Coyne as a warlord figure, Steve Blum and a surprise voice cameo by Martin Scorsese.
The film is set in the post-Empire era, after the original trilogy. Din Djarin and Grogu are now working with the New Republic, and Colonel Ward sends them on a mission involving the Hutts. That mission leads them to Rotta the Hutt, Jabba the Hutt’s son, who is now presented as a gladiator-style fighter. The plot includes Empire remnants, Hutt politics, alien worlds, rescue missions, creature encounters, action sequences and the familiar father-child bond between Mando and Grogu.
For general viewers, the film appears designed to be accessible even without complete knowledge of the Disney+ series. Several reviews note that the story is simple, mission-driven and self-contained. But that same simplicity is also the source of criticism. For some critics, The Mandalorian and Grogu works as a light adventure. For others, it feels too modest for the big screen, especially because Star Wars is returning to theaters after years of absence.
The overall critical mood is mixed. Positive reviews praise the action, creature design, family-friendly tone and Grogu’s charm. Some critics say the film works as an old-school adventure and a user-friendly entry point into this corner of the galaxy. Mixed and negative reviews, however, repeatedly describe it as generic, disposable or too close to a supersized TV episode. The film may satisfy fans looking for comfort and nostalgia, but it does not seem to be convincing critics who expected a major cinematic reset for Star Wars.
Owen Gleiberman of Variety offers one of the most nuanced readings. He describes The Mandalorian and Grogu as an efficient adventure that only pretends to be a real Star Wars movie, while also suggesting that this may not be entirely a bad thing. For Gleiberman, the film carries the small-screen consciousness of The Mandalorian, and that may now be part of what Star Wars has become. He sees the movie as fun in a slightly flat way, built around “lite Star Wars nostalgia” rather than epic ambition.
That reading is important because it does not simply dismiss the film. Gleiberman argues that The Mandalorian worked on television because it lowered the pressure on Star Wars. It did not try to recreate the mythic scale of the original films. Instead, it offered a smaller, more episodic form of space adventure. The movie version, in his view, brings that same compact quality to theaters. It may not feel like a grand Star Wars event, but it does offer a likable, diverting and semi-forgettable adventure with big-budget action.
Kate Erbland of IndieWire is more direct in her criticism. She calls the film a supersized episode and describes it as Star Wars at its most generic. Her review says the film is inessential and inoffensive, frequently adorable and fun for the whole family, but ultimately feels like three good-enough TV episodes smushed together. That phrase captures one of the most common criticisms around the film: it may be pleasant to watch, but it struggles to justify why it needed to be a theatrical movie.
IndieWire also points out that some of the film’s best elements are its simplest pleasures: Grogu, Sigourney Weaver’s presence and Martin Scorsese’s cameo as a panini-slinging local merchant. But Erbland argues that the film feels small, disposable and content-like. The criticism is not that the film is aggressively bad, but that it does not ask enough of itself. It offers movement, references and charm, but not enough ambition to feel like a new chapter in theatrical Star Wars.
The Guardian also takes a mixed position, calling the film a decent feature outing. The review recognizes the familiar ingredients: Hutts, aliens, shady side characters, battles, dogfights and nostalgia. In that sense, the film looks and moves like Star Wars. But the criticism is that it lacks warmth, humour and emotional stakes. That response reflects a wider concern: the film has the outer shape of a Star Wars adventure, but not always the emotional weight that would make it feel essential.
Matt Zoller Seitz of RogerEbert.com offers one of the harshest reactions. His Rotten Tomatoes pull quote gives the film 1.5/4 and says there is no reason for anything in the movie except the wish to make more money. This is the sharpest version of the corporate-extension criticism. For Seitz, the film is not just modest or generic; it represents franchise machinery moving forward without enough creative necessity.
Slashfilm is also strongly negative, giving the film 4/10 and arguing that it feels like several dull episodes stretched to feature length. The review criticizes the lack of character purpose and questions the film’s need for a big-screen outing. This criticism connects directly to the central debate around the film: visual scale alone does not make something cinematic. A movie can have bigger effects, bigger battles and more expensive production values, but still feel structurally like television.
The Rotten Tomatoes reactions show the split even more clearly. On the positive side, Samuel Leggett Jr. of JVS Media & Productions / Team JVS gives the film 9.5/10, praising the choreography, fight scenes and action as top-notch. He says fans of Star Wars, fans of the show and viewers looking for entertaining cinema are likely to enjoy it. This is the most enthusiastic fan-friendly response and suggests that the film may work very well for its target audience.
Lupe Rodriguez Haas of CineMovie.tv gives the film an A-, saying it does not expand Star Wars mythology or lore, but delivers nuanced fan service and works as a fun family adventure. That is a useful positive reading because it accepts the film’s limitations while still finding value in its tone. The film may not deepen the galaxy, but it can still function as accessible entertainment.
John Wenzel of Denver Post gives the film 3/4 and calls it glorious high adventure that is accessible and visually daring. Kyle Wilson of The Lamplight Review gives it 3.5/5, describing it as a vibrant, multiworld-spanning actioner and a user-friendly introduction to the title characters. These reactions suggest that the film’s accessibility is one of its strengths. It may not require deep franchise homework, which is important for a series often criticized for becoming too tangled in its own continuity.
Laura Clifford of Reeling Reviews gives the film a B, noting that viewers do not need to have seen the Disney+ series to follow what is happening. At the same time, she says it adds little to the larger Star Wars saga. That response sits near the middle of the critical divide: the film is entertaining and easy to follow, but not especially meaningful as franchise progression.
Wenlei Ma of The Nightly gives the film 3.5/5, saying the most important stakes in this corner of the Star Wars universe remain personal. That is one of the stronger defenses of the film’s smaller scale. Not every Star Wars story has to be about galactic destiny. The bond between Din Djarin and Grogu has always been more intimate, and for some critics, that remains enough.
On the negative side, Fico Cangiano of CineXpress gives the film 2.5/5, calling it an underwhelming and unremarkable return for Star Wars to the big screen. Anthony O’Connor of FILMINK calls it “terminally bland(alorian),” a sharp summary of the view that the film lacks personality despite its familiar branding. These reactions suggest that nostalgia and recognizable imagery are not enough for critics who wanted a stronger cinematic identity.
Matt Hudson of What I Watched Tonight gives the film 2.5/5, saying it lacks narrative purpose, struggles tonally and does not fully justify a big-screen outing. Carla Hay of Culture Mix says the film does not live up to the standards of other Star Wars movies, describing the first half as dull and the second half as predictable. These responses focus less on franchise fatigue and more on basic storytelling concerns: purpose, pacing, tone and predictability.
Robert Kojder of Flickering Myth gives the film 2.5/5, calling it technically competent and visually spectacular but lifeless and hollow underneath. Joshua Ryan of FandomWire gives it 4/10, criticizing the writing as bland, stale and overly expository. Ezequiel Boetti of Otroscines.com gives it 2/5, saying the film feels like a double or triple episode with a larger budget and visual scale, but without a true identity of its own. Together, these reactions underline the main negative consensus: the film may be polished, but polish is not the same as purpose.
The common praise across reviews is easy to identify. Grogu remains charming. Din Djarin and Grogu’s bond still works for many critics. The film offers family-friendly adventure, creature designs, alien worlds, action choreography and familiar Star Wars energy. Several critics appreciate that the story is accessible to casual viewers and does not demand full knowledge of every Disney+ episode. For fans who want light space escapism, the film appears to deliver enough.
The common criticism is just as clear. Many critics feel the film plays like an extended TV episode. It does not significantly expand Star Wars mythology. It offers limited character development and thin emotional stakes. Some reviews call the writing bland or overly expository. Others argue that the film is technically competent but hollow. The biggest concern is that The Mandalorian and Grogu may be enjoyable as content, but not strong enough as cinema.
From a Planet of Films perspective, The Mandalorian and Grogu appears to divide critics because it carries the strengths and limitations of its streaming origins. The father-child bond, creature-based adventure and episodic mission structure are exactly what made the Disney+ series popular. But on the big screen, those same qualities create a higher expectation. A theatrical Star Wars film is expected to feel like an event, not just a longer and louder chapter.
That tension defines the response. If viewers approach the film as a large-scale episode of The Mandalorian, they may find enough action, humour, Grogu moments and familiar adventure to enjoy it. But if they approach it as the return of Star Wars cinema, the film may feel too safe, too small and too dependent on franchise comfort. The movie’s biggest question is not whether it entertains, but whether entertainment alone is enough for a theatrical Star Wars comeback.
The final consensus is that Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu is not being dismissed as a total failure, but it is also not being treated as a major franchise rebirth. Critics who enjoy it praise the spectacle, Grogu’s charm, family-friendly adventure and the pleasure of seeing Star Wars back in theaters. Critics who are less convinced argue that the film is too episodic, emotionally thin and inessential to justify its big-screen status. It may work best for fans who want a familiar adventure rather than a bold new direction.
Film: Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu
Director: Jon Favreau
Writers: Jon Favreau, Dave Filoni, Noah Kloor
Cast: Pedro Pascal, Sigourney Weaver, Jeremy Allen White, Jonny Coyne, Steve Blum, Martin Scorsese
Studio: Lucasfilm
Distributor: Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
Genre: Space adventure / Sci-fi action
Runtime: 132 minutes
Rating: PG-13
Release Date: May 22, 2026
Premise: Din Djarin and Grogu are drawn into a New Republic mission involving Rotta the Hutt, Imperial remnants and dangerous forces in the post-Empire galaxy.
Read More Review Roundups on POF