Iron Lung arrives as one of the most unusual theatrical horror releases in recent years—an independently produced, creator-driven film that crossed over from niche gaming culture into wide theatrical circulation. Written, directed by, and starring Markiplier (Mark Fischbach), Iron Lung adapts the cult indie horror game of the same name into a feature-length experience built almost entirely around claustrophobia, sound, and sustained dread. Its release strategy and unexpectedly solid box-office performance have made it a talking point beyond genre circles, even as critical opinion across global publications remains sharply divided.
The film’s premise is intentionally minimal. Set almost entirely inside a small, pressurised vessel submerged beneath an alien ocean of blood, Iron Lung follows a lone operator tasked with navigating the depths in near-total isolation. Communication is limited, visibility is compromised, and danger is implied rather than constantly shown. Critics across outlets note that the film’s early stretch is devoted almost entirely to mood-building—tight framing, oppressive sound design, and the slow accumulation of anxiety—rather than narrative complexity. This fidelity to the game’s core design philosophy becomes both the film’s greatest strength and its most contentious creative choice.
Across global publications, the critical consensus around Iron Lung has been markedly polarised. Outlets such as Variety, Empire, and The Guardian acknowledge the film’s ambition and its commitment to atmosphere, describing it as a bold, uncompromising debut that refuses to dilute its core idea for accessibility. Variety framed the film as an audacious experiment in sensory horror, noting how rarely contemporary genre cinema is willing to sustain tension without narrative hand-holding. Empire highlighted the film’s oppressive soundscape and single-location discipline as evidence of a filmmaker willing to trust discomfort as a storytelling tool. By contrast, publications including IndieWire, The New York Times, and several game-press outlets expressed reservations about the film’s pacing and endurance, arguing that its central conceit struggles to sustain feature-length momentum.
The strongest praise clusters around Iron Lung’s atmosphere and technical control. Multiple critics single out the sound design as the film’s most effective weapon, with mechanical groans, distorted transmissions, and long stretches of near-silence doing much of the narrative work. RogerEbert.com described the audio landscape as “the film’s most expressive character,” while The Guardian noted that the film understands how fear often comes from anticipation rather than payoff. Several reviews also commend Fischbach’s willingness to resist traditional horror escalation, allowing tension to plateau uncomfortably rather than constantly spike. For supporters, this restraint is precisely what sets Iron Lung apart from more conventional studio horror.
However, the same qualities that draw admiration also fuel criticism. A recurring critique across IndieWire, The New York Times, and PC Gamer concerns the film’s second half, where several reviewers feel the narrative begins to over-explain its mythology and introduce noise—both literal and figurative—that undercuts the earlier precision. PC Gamer observed that the first hour’s carefully sustained dread gives way to a more conventional escalation that blunts the film’s most distinctive qualities. Others argue that the attempt to expand the story beyond the game’s minimal framework introduces exposition that clashes with the film’s earlier commitment to ambiguity.
Performance and authorship are also central to critical discussion. As a largely solo on-screen presence, Mark Fischbach’s performance has been described as serviceable and committed rather than traditionally expressive. The Hollywood Reporter noted that the film leans less on acting range than on physical presence and endurance, positioning Fischbach more as a conduit for the audience’s anxiety than as a psychologically layered character. Critics generally agree that his directorial control is more impressive than his performance, particularly in how rigorously he maintains tone and spatial coherence in an extremely limited setting.
Audience response, however, tells a slightly different story. Despite its challenging structure and divisive reviews, Iron Lung has posted a moderate-to-good box-office showing for an independently released horror film, benefiting from a strong opening weekend and sustained interest driven by fan mobilisation. Trade observers point out that the film’s reported opening—remarkable for a self-distributed indie—reflects both the loyalty of Fischbach’s existing audience and a broader appetite for distinctive horror experiences outside the studio system. Several publications note that audience reactions skew more positive than critical ones, particularly among viewers familiar with the game or receptive to slow-burn horror.
Within industry commentary, Iron Lung is increasingly discussed as a case study in alternative distribution and creator-led filmmaking. Screen Daily and Box Office Pro have highlighted how the film’s rollout demonstrates the commercial potential of digitally native creators transitioning into theatrical spaces, provided the concept remains sharply defined. Critics caution that this success may not be easily replicable, but agree that Iron Lung has expanded the conversation around who gets to make feature films—and how they reach audiences.
From a technical standpoint, reviewers largely agree that the film’s craft is disciplined if not expansive. Cinematography is constrained by design, editing is deliberately repetitive to reinforce monotony, and production design prioritises functionality over visual flourish. Some critics admire this rigor; others find it exhausting. The film’s runtime has been a particular point of contention, with several reviewers suggesting that a shorter cut might have preserved its intensity more effectively.
In closing, the global critical response to Iron Lung reflects the risks inherent in its approach. Supporters see it as a rare exercise in sustained, minimalist horror—an indie film willing to trust atmosphere over explanation and discomfort over catharsis. Detractors view it as an experiment that overextends its premise and underestimates the demands of feature-length storytelling. What both sides largely agree on is that Iron Lung is not easily dismissed: its theatrical footprint, audience engagement, and uncompromising creative choices ensure that it stands out in a crowded horror landscape, even if it does not satisfy all who descend into its depths.
Iron Lung is written, directed by, and stars Mark Fischbach, with a compact supporting cast and a runtime just under two hours.
Read More Review Roundups on POF
