Tom Hanks has weighed in on one of Hollywood’s long-running awards debates, arguing that voice actors deserve greater recognition from the Academy Awards but not through the creation of a separate Oscar category.
The two-time Academy Award winner shared his views while promoting Toy Story 5, where he reprises his iconic role as Woody more than three decades after the original film launched Pixar’s beloved franchise. While many industry observers have called for a dedicated Oscar category for voice acting, Hanks believes exceptional voice performances should instead compete alongside traditional acting performances in the Academy’s existing categories.
According to Hanks, the Oscars do not need additional categories to recognize voice work. Instead, he believes the Academy should focus on the quality of a performance and its ability to connect with audiences, regardless of whether the actor appears physically on screen. “I think they have enough categories,” Hanks said. “The truth is, truly, a voice actor can win Best Actor. The judgment is ‘any performance that moved you.'”
The actor’s comments arrive at a time when discussions about performance recognition continue to evolve across the entertainment industry. While voice actors have played a vital role in some of cinema’s most beloved animated films, they have historically remained absent from the Academy’s acting categories. Although the Oscars introduced the Best Animated Feature category in 2002, voice performers themselves have never received recognition in the major acting races.
Hanks believes the issue is not the lack of a dedicated category but rather how performances are evaluated. For him, acting should be judged on emotional impact rather than visibility. If a performance moves audiences, it should be considered worthy of recognition regardless of whether the actor appears in front of a camera or behind a microphone.
To support his argument, Hanks pointed to acclaimed performer Andy Serkis, whose groundbreaking work in motion-capture acting has frequently sparked conversations about awards recognition. Over the years, Serkis has earned widespread praise for bringing characters such as Gollum in The Lord of the Rings trilogy and Caesar in the Planet of the Apes franchise to life through performance-capture technology.
Despite audiences rarely seeing Serkis himself on screen, Hanks argued that the actor remains the creative force behind those performances. The technology may alter the appearance of the character, but the emotions, physicality, and performance all originate from the actor.
“Even though he does not appear as Andy Serkis, he gives all the raw material to it,” Hanks explained. “There’s been people who have been close to being nominated that do not appear on camera. That could happen to a pure-vocal actor.”
The comparison is particularly relevant in an era where advances in digital filmmaking continue to blur the boundaries between traditional acting, voice work, and performance capture. As visual effects and animation become increasingly sophisticated, questions about how the industry defines acting have become more prominent.
For decades, animated films have relied on powerful voice performances to bring their characters to life. Many of the most memorable characters in modern cinema exist largely because of the actors behind them. Yet those performances have traditionally been recognized through the success of the film itself rather than through individual acting awards.
Tom Hanks‘ perspective offers an alternative to the growing calls for a separate voice acting Oscar. Rather than creating a new category, he believes voice actors should be eligible to compete directly against live-action performers if their work is deemed worthy of consideration. Such an approach would place voice acting on equal footing with other forms of performance instead of treating it as a separate discipline.
The conversation is likely to continue as animation remains one of the industry’s most popular and commercially successful forms of storytelling. At the same time, motion-capture performers and voice actors continue to push the boundaries of what acting can look like in modern filmmaking. Hanks’ comments also carry particular weight given his long association with one of cinema’s most iconic animated characters. Since first voicing Woody in 1995’s Toy Story, he has helped shape a franchise that has become a landmark in animation history and demonstrated the power of voice performances to create lasting emotional connections with audiences across generations.
As animation and performance-capture technologies continue to evolve, the debate surrounding awards recognition is unlikely to disappear anytime soon. Whether voice performances eventually break into the Academy’s acting races remains to be seen, but Hanks believes the opportunity already exists. The actor shared his views during a recent conversation with Gold Derby while promoting Toy Story 5, arguing that exceptional voice performances should be judged by the same standards as any other acting performance.
Read More:
Tom Hanks Says Great Voice Performances Belong in Acting Categories
Desk
June 12, 2026
Tom Hanks has weighed in on one of Hollywood’s long-running awards debates, arguing that voice actors deserve greater recognition from the Academy Awards but not through the creation of a separate Oscar category.
The two-time Academy Award winner shared his views while promoting Toy Story 5, where he reprises his iconic role as Woody more than three decades after the original film launched Pixar’s beloved franchise. While many industry observers have called for a dedicated Oscar category for voice acting, Hanks believes exceptional voice performances should instead compete alongside traditional acting performances in the Academy’s existing categories.
According to Hanks, the Oscars do not need additional categories to recognize voice work. Instead, he believes the Academy should focus on the quality of a performance and its ability to connect with audiences, regardless of whether the actor appears physically on screen. “I think they have enough categories,” Hanks said. “The truth is, truly, a voice actor can win Best Actor. The judgment is ‘any performance that moved you.'”
The actor’s comments arrive at a time when discussions about performance recognition continue to evolve across the entertainment industry. While voice actors have played a vital role in some of cinema’s most beloved animated films, they have historically remained absent from the Academy’s acting categories. Although the Oscars introduced the Best Animated Feature category in 2002, voice performers themselves have never received recognition in the major acting races.
Hanks believes the issue is not the lack of a dedicated category but rather how performances are evaluated. For him, acting should be judged on emotional impact rather than visibility. If a performance moves audiences, it should be considered worthy of recognition regardless of whether the actor appears in front of a camera or behind a microphone.
To support his argument, Hanks pointed to acclaimed performer Andy Serkis, whose groundbreaking work in motion-capture acting has frequently sparked conversations about awards recognition. Over the years, Serkis has earned widespread praise for bringing characters such as Gollum in The Lord of the Rings trilogy and Caesar in the Planet of the Apes franchise to life through performance-capture technology.
Despite audiences rarely seeing Serkis himself on screen, Hanks argued that the actor remains the creative force behind those performances. The technology may alter the appearance of the character, but the emotions, physicality, and performance all originate from the actor.
“Even though he does not appear as Andy Serkis, he gives all the raw material to it,” Hanks explained. “There’s been people who have been close to being nominated that do not appear on camera. That could happen to a pure-vocal actor.”
The comparison is particularly relevant in an era where advances in digital filmmaking continue to blur the boundaries between traditional acting, voice work, and performance capture. As visual effects and animation become increasingly sophisticated, questions about how the industry defines acting have become more prominent.
For decades, animated films have relied on powerful voice performances to bring their characters to life. Many of the most memorable characters in modern cinema exist largely because of the actors behind them. Yet those performances have traditionally been recognized through the success of the film itself rather than through individual acting awards.
Tom Hanks‘ perspective offers an alternative to the growing calls for a separate voice acting Oscar. Rather than creating a new category, he believes voice actors should be eligible to compete directly against live-action performers if their work is deemed worthy of consideration. Such an approach would place voice acting on equal footing with other forms of performance instead of treating it as a separate discipline.
The conversation is likely to continue as animation remains one of the industry’s most popular and commercially successful forms of storytelling. At the same time, motion-capture performers and voice actors continue to push the boundaries of what acting can look like in modern filmmaking. Hanks’ comments also carry particular weight given his long association with one of cinema’s most iconic animated characters. Since first voicing Woody in 1995’s Toy Story, he has helped shape a franchise that has become a landmark in animation history and demonstrated the power of voice performances to create lasting emotional connections with audiences across generations.
As animation and performance-capture technologies continue to evolve, the debate surrounding awards recognition is unlikely to disappear anytime soon. Whether voice performances eventually break into the Academy’s acting races remains to be seen, but Hanks believes the opportunity already exists. The actor shared his views during a recent conversation with Gold Derby while promoting Toy Story 5, arguing that exceptional voice performances should be judged by the same standards as any other acting performance.
Read More:
Share this post :
SPOT LIGHT
SHABANA AZMI TO PLAY ANTAGONIST ‘NAFISA’ IN EMRAAN HASHMI AND DISHA PATANI’S AWARAPAN 2
Sony Future Filmmaker Awards 2026 Winners Announced as Global Emerging Talent Takes Center Stage
Heart of the Beast Trailer: Brad Pitt and His Loyal Dog Fight to Survive the Alaskan Wilderness
Why You Rarely Notice Junior Artists, And Why That’s the Point
Aaron Sorkin Returns to Facebook’s Story With The Social Reckoning Trailer
Rajinikanth’s Kochadaiiyaan Gets an AI-Powered Revival as Eros Bets Big on the Future of Film Libraries
Veteran Tamil Filmmaker and Actor Bharathiraja Passes Away at 84
Disclosure Day Review Roundup: Critics Call Steven Spielberg’s Sci-Fi Epic One of His Best in Years
Toy Story 5 First Reactions Arrive as Taylor Swift’s Soundtrack Song Breaks Records
WEB STORIES
When Santa Went Wrong at the Movies
Best Biopic Movies of All Time
Top 10 Most Iconic Bollywood Villains Ever
Top 10 Female Directors You Should Know
The Vicky Kaushal Transformation: From Masaan to Chhaava
Films with the Most Iconic Opening Scenes
What Makes These 5 Film Festivals a Dream for Every Director?
The Emotional Palette: How Color Shapes Storytelling in Film
Jim Carrey Facts That Will Blow Your Mind
Through Their Eyes: The Power of Limited Perspectives in Cinema
Mission: Impossible – Impossible Missions Through the Years
Manoj Kumar: The Bollywood Icon Who Made India His Hero
Top 5 Must-Watch Marathi Films
Top 10 Iconic Bollywood Mujra Performances
10 Times South Korean Cinema Surprised the World
Woody Allen’s 10 Best Films: Classics, Cult & Masterpieces!